Rights versus Privledge versus Choices

The Christian/Conservative Right generally believes that:

Marriage is not a right. It is a lifestyle choice. It is a want, not a need.

Parenting is not a right, it is a lifestyle choice for two people who want to go that route.  Two people of the opposite sex biologically create life.

If a Christian person is single they do not have their rights infringed upon if they do not find a partner suitable to marry.  They do not have any right to be a parent, it is a lifestyle choice.

Yes, you do have a choice when pregnant. What the Right is trying to point out that it is a baby when you want it to be, it is also a baby when you don't want it to be.

Example: If a man beats a pregnant woman and the baby dies in utero he can be convicted of genocide but the woman can kill the same baby and it is legal to the Left, and the Left wants it to be tax payer funded. (I heard a case like this recently on my local news).

The debates between the Right and the Left come down to money.

If you want to have an abortion, it is on your own conscience. Biologically speaking this is killing a baby and you make that choice, the tax payers should not have to pay for it. Pay for it yourself.

If you want to marry your alternative lifestyle partner, I believe you can become domestic partners in the JP right now. What the cause they are fighting for under the guise of equality and love is money and tax and insurance benefits.  They want the same married benefits when it comes to finances.  Okay, say they get the same marriage benefits that's fine. But they do not have the right to get married in a Church.  And they do not have the right to enforce a Business Owners refusal to work on projects to push their agenda. Private businesses can turn down business. Most do not because they want/need the money but occasionally is happens and as a private business owner, they can turn down a job if needed.  

In Business, owners have free will in request for proposals to submit on projects or turn down projects. If a baker doesn't want to work on a gay wedding, it's not not a matter of legal action and could be seen as a frivolous lawsuit clouding up the legal system to push an agenda.

I get aggravated when I see heterosexual couples getting married in the Catholic Church paying lip service to Matrimony when neither spouse practices Mass or their Faith outside of the wedding events. These couples do not want to take time out of a normal Sunday to pay worship and praise to God but when they want to get married it needs to be in a Church in front of their family and friends.
If you want to stand in front of your loved ones in a Church, think about going to see God each week in Prayer.

Pushing the gay agenda and the pro choice agenda can be seen as bullying technically, and the tolerance and co-existence they preach is always only used when pushing their side.

I am typing this to get people to think. Next time you think you have a Right to something.  Is it a want or a need? Is it really a Right?